Molly inspired me to add up my total training miles and time for 2010. It's great to set a benchmark and see progress year over year. What's really interesting is to see that I spent almost half of my total training time in the pool! I really sucked at swimming for the first half of the year :-)
- Bike: 971 miles - 64%
- Run: 484 miles - 32%
- Swim: 58.2 miles - 4%
- Total miles: 1513
And my time breakdown:
- Bike: 75 hrs - 26%
- Run: 77 hrs - 27%
- Swim: 136 hrs - 47%
- Total hours: 288
I didn't spend much time on the bike because I was learning how to swim and run. So, no surprise, I was just in maintenance mode and never saw any improvements on the bike. And improvements were (and still are) sorely needed; compared to the flatlands of Dallas where I used to ride, the hills of northern California were a rude awakening! But at least I got my run and swim up to "not great but doesn't suck" status. So for 2011 I'm starting out in a mediocre yet fairly balanced position in all three sports... I don't stand out in any one of them, but I feel like I have a lot of upward potential in all three.
I guess the question is, is it better to focus on excelling at one of them this year (like the bike), or focus on improving all three of them equally? I suppose it's more of a theoretical question at this point since I can't run, but an interesting question nonetheless. That's what makes triathlon such an intriguing sport; it requires a lot of thought, planning, weighing pros/cons. It's like a puzzle, and I'm such the typical INTJ that loves puzzles. No wonder I love this sport.
Oh, and more numbers fun: I discovered today during 1-legged drills on the trainer that I can push cadence significantly faster on my injured leg versus my non-injured leg. Which may be the cause (at least one of them, anyway) of this chronic hamstring issue. Interesting!!! I've done these drills on a spin bike but never noticed the difference because I didn't have the data. Numbers rock.